[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time
|
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
|
Subject: |
Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:35:11 -0200 |
2007/11/29, Trevor Bača <address@hidden>:
> Excellent. I think what clued me in was the error message about going
> *backwards* in time ...
>
> And, yes: I think Han-Wen and the gurus really *really* got it right on the
> time-keeping: AFAICS, it's all rationals all the time and so completely
> exact.
Actually, lily should never go backwards in time, not even if you have
really wonky time sigs and tuplets, so this is definitively a bug.
One possibility is that you have an overflow error: the rationals use
32 bit integers, so they easily overflow if you do strange things.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen