lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time


From: Trevor Bača
Subject: Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:42:18 -0600

On Nov 29, 2007 6:28 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
2007/11/29, Adam James Wilson <address@hidden>:
> I see -- so even with my arithmetic error (which started as a tiny
> offset of 9/6319), we should expect Lily to render the score.
>
> I can see that if fractional relations get complex enough to require
> more precision than 32-bit values, there could be a problem.
>
> Is a possible solution to use 64-bit representation internally?

It's an option, but it's a stopgap measure.   The real solution is to
have a arbitrary precision arithmetic. GUILE already provides that,
but it would have a slight but noticeable performance impact.

Maybe a compile-time option to chose between the two?
 


--
Trevor Bača
address@hidden
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]