lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches


From: Kurt Kroon
Subject: Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:00:04 -0800
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618

On 1/14/08 10:19 AM, "Rune Zedeler" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Citat Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden>:
> 
>> - In Accidentals, I wouldn't refer to "Nordic and Germanic languages",
>> since both Swedish,
>>   Danish, Norwegian and German use "-iss" and "-ess" (admittedly the
>> same concept, but
>>   a different spelling).
> 
> This is not correct.
> In Danish we do not use "-ss" at all. That would be a spelling mistake. We
> only
> use the "-is" and "-es" endings (except for es and as, ofcourse).
> I am pretty convinced that the same is true for German.

My reputable reference manual[1] agrees with Rune vis-à-vis note names in
German.

It doesn't mention Danish or Swedish, so I will defer to Rune and Mats,
respectively, and make the necessary changes -- one 's' or two respectively
-- in the list of pitch names at the back of the glossary.

I'll also see what other messes I have to clean up, passim.

KK

[1] The New Harvard Dictionary of Music, ed. Don Randell, 1986.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]