lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought


From: Trevor Bača
Subject: Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:08:23 -0600

On Jan 23, 2008 2:39 AM, Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> wrote:
2008/1/22, Graham Percival <address@hidden>:

> I agree; I've never encountered the term "half-flats".  But maybe
> it's a European thing?  (or a poor translation from the
> appropriate terms in Dutch or French or something?)

Please do not *always* assume that because something is weird, it must
be French :)

In France we say "quarter".

;-)

Right, I say change the terms in our docs.

Sidenote: Graham had suggested (maybe jokingly?) to check the wikipedia history under "Accidentals" to find out how the term got into their docs (which is how I suspect it crept into ours). I clicked over yesterday, found more than 500 revisions, briefly considred doing a binary search by hand, and then decided that I didn't have the time to bypass a missing search interface by hand (or that I didn't understand the wiki searching process correctly.)

The correct terms in English are:

cff     c double flat
ctqf   c three-quarters flat
cf      c flat
cqf    c quarter-flag
c
cqs   c quarter-sharp
cs     c sharp
ctqs  c three-quarters sharp
css   c double sharp


(If anyone can ever trace the terms "half-flat" and "flat-and-a-half" to some other language or system of usage, I'd love to hear about for the trivia file.)




--
Trevor Bača
address@hidden
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]