[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:03:53 -0700 |
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:18:18 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ralph Palmer wrote:
>
> > 2.3.1 Bowed instruments
>
> > I'd like to see "Fingerings"
>
> I'm not a string player and know nothing of this. Is the
> normal fingering notation shown in NR 1.7.1 adequate for
> this, or are you looking for something peculiar to strings?
1.7.1 is all they need. Well, maybe \open as well... although -0
works almost as well.
> > and possibly something about articulations
> > generally associated with just strings (if there are any).
>
> I'll throw this open to the list - are there any?
Nope.
Granted, I cheated a bit by including \thumb in 1.7.1, but I don't
think there's anything else. I suppose you *could* argue that
parts for very inexperienced string players could benefit from a
\textSpanner that says "II" (ie a hand position). However, that
kind of thing is IMO best covered with snippets anyway.
I would expect (and hope!) that the snippet lists for NR 2
sections would be quite long.
Cheers,
- Graham