Re: F7 chord appearing as E#7 when I transpose

[Paul Scott]

Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2008/6/13 Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden>:
>   
>> Since the same request has appeared for ordinary notes, some clever Scheme
>> hackers have
>> made a function that automatically gets rid of the extra accidentals by
>> enharmonically rewriting the
>> music.
>>     
>
> Dumb question: are we sure we still do need the ordinary \transpose?
>
> If not, may be we could make it "smarter" by implementing the snippet
> as a default code... (possibly keeping the current function as an
> \old-transpose command for backwards compatibility?)
>
>  Or is it likely to break many many many things?
>   
Of course we want transposition to be theoretically correct as the default.

When I run into a transposition such as the OP has given I look for
other transpositions which might give me what I want or I break the
piece into parts and transpose the parts differently.

This is not to discourage the solution presented by Mats as an option.

Paul Scott

> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>