[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: not-so-ancient flags
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: not-so-ancient flags |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:59:04 +0200 (CEST) |
> i guess i have to apply your patch (and werner's)
Only my patch.
> to the sources and recompile lilypond, right? is it OK to patch
> against 2.11.49 sources?
Yes.
> how can i modify the file to get what i want?
>
> +straight_flag_angle = -37;
> +straight_upflag_length# = .65 black_notehead_width# + stemthickness# / 2;
> +straight_downflag_length# = .833 black_notehead_width# +
> stemthickness# / 2;
> +straight_flag_thickness# = 0.5 staff_space#;
>
> how do you proceed? by trial and error, modifying those values,
> compiling and looking at the results?
Usually yes. If you find good values, we can still check that later
on to parameterize if needed.
Werner
- not-so-ancient flags, madhg, 2008/06/16
- Re: not-so-ancient flags, Valentin Villenave, 2008/06/16
- Re: not-so-ancient flags, madhg, 2008/06/17
- Re: not-so-ancient flags, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/06/19
- Re: not-so-ancient flags, madhg, 2008/06/19
- Re: not-so-ancient flags, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/06/19
- Re: not-so-ancient flags, luis jure, 2008/06/19
- Re: not-so-ancient flags,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: not-so-ancient flags, luis jure, 2008/06/20
- Re: not-so-ancient flags, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/06/28
Re: not-so-ancient flags, madhg, 2008/06/18