[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!)
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:54:08 -0700 |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Patrick Horgan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Thanks, it let me get a good look at it. All in all, so far I prefer
> Patrick's except for unvisited links. It's not obvious enough that they are
> something to click on until I hover. The color is so close to the color of
> the normal text, (Firefox 3 on Linux), that even the font difference isn't
> enough to tell. Jacob Nielson's guidelines are based on extensive usability
> studies with experienced and non-experienced web users. They really make a
> difference. Note that he says that you don't necessarily have to underline
> if the color difference is noticable enough, but that you should never
> underline anything else on a web page because people think that denotes a
> link. He also says never use blue text even if that's not your link color
> because people expect blue text to be clickable.
Hi Patrick,
If you have any suggestions for different colors in any part of my
design, please post them. I am not very knowledgable with color
theory (yet).
Regarding the link underlining, this is still under debate, and I'm undecided.
Thanks for your comments,
-Patrick
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), (continued)
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/13
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/14
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Henning Hraban Ramm, 2008/09/14
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/14
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/14
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/14
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/17
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick Horgan, 2008/09/17
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!),
Patrick McCarty <=
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Valentin Villenave, 2008/09/17
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/17
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/30
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/30
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/18
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/17
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), David Séverin, 2008/09/18
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/30
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/30
- Re: WANTED: Design for documentation (Photoshop power users!), Patrick Horgan, 2008/09/17