|
From: | Hans Aberg |
Subject: | Re: elegant compound time signatures |
Date: | Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:14:07 +0200 |
On 20 Oct 2008, at 12:53, Graham Percival wrote:
The second problem is that LilyPond beamings varies quite a bit fromversion to version, so sprinkling, so this solution may not be stable.This shouldn't be a problem if you set up the overrides correctly, and as long as there aren't any regression bugs.
I am not sure what is gong on. I used \time 11/16 \set beatGrouping = #'(2 2 3 2 2) \set subdivideBeams = ##t #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 11 16) 4 16) #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 11 16) 7 16)which worked fine in an earlier LilyPond 2.11.* version, but not know. I have experienced similar problems in the past.
Hans: at the risk of sounding grumpy, did you try compiling my example? I believe it does everything you want.Yes, I think it was clear from my reply. I mentioned that although writing in each measure \unset subdivideBeams \unset beatLength does the job, it is a bit cumbersome.Ah, that's what you meant by "It is though too complicated to wrte stuff i each measure" [sic]. Sorry.
Yes. Think of writing a time in 4-time, and having to write that in in every measure. Though a fix, counterintuitive, as the fix belongs to the meter and not the measure.
Hans
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |