[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: short instrument name setting
From: |
Cameron Horsburgh |
Subject: |
Re: short instrument name setting |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:23:58 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:41:38PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2009/1/8 Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden>:
>
> > That's exactly what I said — thanks for the +1! ;-)
>
> +another 1 for me.
>
> \tag sucks, \context rulz.
Yeah... \context is okay, I guess, but surely my way of doing
this---using \set short.InstrumentName in the appropriate \staff block
is the more idiomatic way to go. That way the definition is
*completely* removed from the content. It just seems more LilyPondish.
--
Cameron Horsburgh
Blog: http://spiritcry.wordpress.com/
- Re: short instrument name setting, (continued)
- Re: short instrument name setting, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/01/07
- Re: short instrument name setting, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/01/07
- Re: short instrument name setting, Trevor Daniels, 2009/01/07
- Re: short instrument name setting, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/01/07
- Re: short instrument name setting, Gilles THIBAULT, 2009/01/07
- Re: short instrument name setting, Daniel Hulme, 2009/01/07
- Re: short instrument name setting, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/01/08
- Re: short instrument name setting, Valentin Villenave, 2009/01/08
- Re: short instrument name setting,
Cameron Horsburgh <=
- Re: short instrument name setting, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/01/08
- Re: short instrument name setting, chip, 2009/01/08
- Re: short instrument name setting, James E. Bailey, 2009/01/08
- Re: short instrument name setting, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/01/09
- Re: short instrument name setting, Graham Percival, 2009/01/08
- Re: short instrument name setting, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/01/08