[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius

From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:30:00 +0200 (CEST)

> As far as the exact syntax is concerned would it be possible to just
> use no character at all?
> c4 2 8. 16

Aah, indeed this looks optimal!  Han-Wen?

> We would probably still want a repeat character for when '\repeat
> unfold' is too long:
> c4 & & &

Following your first idea, `c4 4 4 4' would do the same.

> <c e g>4( &\f & &)

This would be `<c e g>4 4\f 4 4'.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]