[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius

From: Nicolas Sceaux
Subject: Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:55:16 +0200

Le 6 avr. 09 à 09:35, Trevor Daniels a écrit :

As I do little note entry myself I don't have a view
on the merits of q vs &, but there is another issue to
consider.  If the base chord being repeated contains
tweaks, fingering, etc, are these to be repeated too?

This should be customizable: a default function would be defined,
that the user could change it if needed. And the same goes for the
repetition character/string.

Somewhere you set:

#(define-public (default-repetition-function previous-chord new-chord)
    ... build a music expression...)
#(ly:parser-repetition-name parser "&")
#(ly:parser-repetition-function parser default-repetition-function)

By default, the repetition string could even be undefined, not to
break existing music code, and set only if needed, say be including

Then the choice of the repetition character or string needs not
be debated anymore, until the thing actually works :)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]