[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Speed
From: |
Tim McNamara |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Speed |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:16:22 -0500 |
On Sep 3, 2009, at 7:04 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
So it looks as though, for any sort of substantial score,
turnaround time will be markedly reduced by using 64-bit Linux.
Thanks for all the comparisons, Nick, that was very interesting. If
I understand the history of LilyPond correctly, it is a Linux
application ported to Windows and OS X. So it's not surprising that
it's faster on the various Linux OSes. Maybe someday I'll get around
to buying an Intel Mac and can install all three OSes on their own
partitions and do a comparison that way.
I use LilyPond on a 1.33 gHz PPC iBook with 1 GB RAM, called from
Carbon Emacs (GNU Emacs 22.2.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0, Carbon
Version 1.6.0)) and while LP is no speed demon, there are a *lot* of
calculations and processes happening and I don't expect a score to be
rendered in 3 seconds.
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Michael David Crawford, 2009/09/01
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/09/01
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Michael David Crawford, 2009/09/01
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/02
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed,
Tim McNamara <=
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Pierre Couderc, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Frank Steinmetzger, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Jonathan Wilkes, 2009/09/03