[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No fiddling claim
From: |
Jonathan Wilkes |
Subject: |
Re: No fiddling claim |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:51:24 -0700 (PDT) |
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:47:44 +0200
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: No fiddling claim
> To: Jonathan Wilkes <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Op maandag 28-09-2009 om 10:33 uur [tijdzone -0700],
> schreef Jonathan
> Wilkes:
>
> > I don't understand the meaning of
> the statement "More often than not
> > it isn't."
>
> What I meant to say is that certain tweaks are
> fundamentally
> not automatable. However, in many cases we
> should expect
> lilypond to do the right thing and if she doesn't, strive
> to make it so.
That sounds good to me.
>
> > For example, in Op. 53 in NR 1.1:
>
> Link please?
>
> I do not see anything you mention here
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/Pitches#Pitches
Yep, that's it. Right underneath The heading "1.1 Pitches", there's a
dotted line, then two systems from a Beethoven Sonata with a green
border around it.
-Jonathan
>
>
> Jan.