[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T] |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:11:40 +0100 |
Op donderdag 12-11-2009 om 08:41 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef David
Kastrup:
> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> _Addressing_ the actual problems is definitely more suitably done on the
> developer list.
So what are the actual problems? Is LilyPond really too difficult?
Do we rely too much on crufty input-language solutions? How many
ritardando-like hacks do we have for common problems? Are they
listed/categorised somewhere?
Maybe it's just that we are not tempting enough to be used.
I cannot imagine that OP would have stopped with a frustating
message to sibelius-user after having paid $$$$ for the program?
That would me he basically threw away that money. Quitting with
LilyPond seems to cost him nothing. He only gets uglier scores
and does not care about the end result, maintainability, shareability,
or the social impact/implications of spending money on proprietary
software as opposed to devising and documenting solutions for
a free software?
How about a frogs project to make our image sexier?
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
AvatarĀ®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl | http://lilypond.org
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], (continued)
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Graham Percival, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/11
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T],
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Francisco Vila, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12