[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
anybody know apache? (dir structure of docs)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
anybody know apache? (dir structure of docs) |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:47:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Anybody want to save me a half an hour of maintenance, and a few
hours of sanity? Look this up.
(alternately, if you already know apache, just answer the question)
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:31:31PM -0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > The technical reasons for using web/ and doc/v2.xx are:
> > - easier rsyncing, moving, verifying
> > - clean namespace -- currently we have quite some other
> > things at the root. it's easy to get collisions, we
> > need to really think this through very well before
> > going forward with this
>
> Can't we have the directory structure internally with /web/ ,
> /download/ what have you, and use some serverside URL rewriting to
> make translate
>
> /foo/
>
> into
>
> /web/foo/
>
> ? Does apache have mechanisms for rewriting the serving path without
> rewriting the URL that appears in browser window?
I would like this. I'd like that a lot. We could keep the
simpler build structure, but still have simpler urls.
Cheers,
- Graham
- anybody know apache? (dir structure of docs),
Graham Percival <=