[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: page break failure
From: |
Hugh Myers |
Subject: |
Re: page break failure |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 00:43:34 -0700 |
Since the project can't be done in 2.12, what do you suggest?
--hsm
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Marc Hohl <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hugh Myers schrieb:
>>
>> Second point taken. I hope you realize that 2.13 has bug fixes for
>> 2.12--- yes?
>
> Yes, but 2.13.x is work in progress. There is a new layout engine
> which is still under improvement, as far as I know.
> So the layout may change considerably between 2.13.x and 2.13.y.
>
> 2.12.x is stable, and so it will be for 2.14.x. In the odd-numbered
> versions, everything can happen without warning.
>>
>> Without those, there is no project...
>
> There has to be the possibility to test the latest development version,
> so the 2.13.x versions are available for everyone, but as they are
> called "development versions", you can't take anything for granted here...
>
> Marc
>
- page break failure, Hugh Myers, 2009/12/01
- Re: page break failure, Alexander Kobel, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure, Hugh Myers, 2009/12/02
- Re: page break failure, Alexander Kobel, 2009/12/02
- collatoral damage / regressions (was: page break failure), Graham Percival, 2009/12/02
- Re: collatoral damage / regressions (was: page break failure), Hugh Myers, 2009/12/02
- Message not available
- Re: collatoral damage / regressions (was: page break failure), Hugh Myers, 2009/12/03
- Re: collatoral damage / regressions, Alexander Kobel, 2009/12/03
- Re: collatoral damage / regressions, Hugh Myers, 2009/12/03