[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond vs Score
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond vs Score |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:04:09 +0100 (CET) |
> I'm not saying it is inconceivable that a DOS-based relic of a
> program would be considered superior to any open source or
> commercially developed notation software over the last twenty years,
> but claims like this set my bullshit detector clanging like a
> chinese fire drill.
:-) Anyway, there is TeX: This is more than 30 years old and still
superior to many, many programs which aim to produce similar output.
> Think of it this way- if you were a major publisher and were
> dependent upon trained professional engravers to provide you with a
> massive variety of material, would it make good business sense at
> all to insist that all these engravers, many graduating from Berklee
> or some other school where Finale or Sibelius is the standard, learn
> another format?
Well, in case Score would be the superior program, I would insist on
that. A comparable situation arises if e.g. people trained to MS Word
have to learn Adobe Publisher... You can't argue that `MS Word is the
standard'...
Werner
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, David Stocker, 2010/02/01
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2010/02/02
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2010/02/22
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, David Stocker, 2010/02/22
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2010/02/22
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, Helge Kruse, 2010/02/24
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, Graham Percival, 2010/02/24
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, Martin Tarenskeen, 2010/02/24
- Re: Lilypond vs Score, Helge Kruse, 2010/02/25