Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond conversion suite)

[Jack Cooper]

Just out of curiosity...

Assuming for the moment that development interest might materialize if there 
were
money involved, approximately how much sponsorship dollars would be involved to
tackle this?

  Jack

--
Jack Cooper, BerLen Music
www.berlenmusic.com
www.jack-cooper.com



----- Original Message ----
> From: Graham Percival <address@hidden>
> To: Martin Tarenskeen <address@hidden>
> Cc: lilypond-user mailinglist <address@hidden>
> Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 6:51:26 AM
> Subject: Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond 
> conversion suite)
> 
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:45:58AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> >
> > But the main problem remains: Lilypond developers are also very happy  
> > Lilypond users, which could explain the lack of motivation to put a lot 
> > of time and effort exporting to a format that only people who do NOT use  
> > Lilypond really need ?


....

> LilyPond is open source.  That means that you can see the workings
> of the software.  LilyPond is Free software.  That means that you
> can legally improve and distribute the software.  Neither of those
> means that people who have improved LilyPond in the past are under
> ANY kind of obligation to you.
> 
> You're blaming lilypond developer for not doing a job that *you*
> are not willing to do.  That's not on.
> 


....

> 
> - Graham
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user