[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:48:21 +0000 |
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Steven White
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Just an inquiry, but is there any specific reason why the mailing list
> doesn't have a prepended subject like [lilypond-user]?
That would make all the subject lines much longer. On some displays,
this wouldn't be a problem, but on people with limited screen size
and/or poor eyesight (both apply to me; I can only comfortably fit
80x25 text on my netbook, which is my primary computer), the extra 15
characters would be most unwelcome.
> It is easy to sort based on the cc/to,
FWIW, I sort based on the List-ID: field. Both methods work, though.
since it _is_ easy to sort based on other aspects of the emails, I
don't see any benefit from adding [lilypond-user] to the subject
lines.
> I would also like to take the time to grovel at the developers of this
> system. It is hands down the most well documented tex style system I have
> ever used.
Thanks! It's great to hear that all the hard work is appreciated.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Steven White, 2010/02/15
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Helge Kruse, 2010/02/15
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Colin Campbell, 2010/02/15
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Steven White, 2010/02/15
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Carl Sorensen, 2010/02/15
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Trevor Daniels, 2010/02/15
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, David Rogers, 2010/02/15
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Peter Wright, 2010/02/16
- Re: Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Peter Wright, 2010/02/16
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Colin Campbell, 2010/02/16
- Re: Mailing Subject Format Inquiry, Steven White, 2010/02/17