[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dynamic and midi velocity
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: dynamic and midi velocity |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:05:47 +0100 |
2010/3/6 Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden>:
> Am Samstag, 6. März 2010 08:47:56 schrieb David Raleigh Arnold:
>> Ideally the volume should be preset for each instrument according to
>> ratios expressing the relative natural loudness of the instrument, IOW
>> set it and forget it, and only velocity should be used for dynamics. That
>> is obviously the purpose of the design. Why fight it? No good can come
>> from twiddling the volume in the middle of the performance.
>
> I know several choral pieces where the dynamics change on a single note. E.g.
> in Reutter's " Ecce Quomodo" there is a whole note with p on the first two
> beats and f on the last two beats. This cannot be expressed by velocity, which
> is modelled after a keyboard, but is unable to express dynamic changes other
> instruments are able to do.
> Similarly, an organ swell on a single note cannot be done with velocity, but
> only via volume.
there are also channel pressure and polyphonic pressure. Not much used
and not very compatible, though
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, (continued)
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, David Raleigh Arnold, 2010/03/04
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, Martin Tarenskeen, 2010/03/04
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, Philippe Hezaine, 2010/03/04
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, David Raleigh Arnold, 2010/03/06
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, David Kastrup, 2010/03/06
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/03/06
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, David Santamauro, 2010/03/06
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, David Raleigh Arnold, 2010/03/11
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, Hugh Myers, 2010/03/11
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/03/06
- Re: dynamic and midi velocity,
Francisco Vila <=