[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Website "easier editing"

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: Website "easier editing"
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 01:39:08 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> I think it's fine the way it is now. Perhaps I wouldn't place Denemo
> above LilyPondTool, although it does make sense to regroup LPT with
> Frescobaldi.
> (Actually, what I *would* do is emphasize LPT, perhaps with a big
> [RECOMMENDED] sign.)

Why not recommend Frescobaldi?  I'm not comfortable placing a
semi-official seal of approval on either one at the expense of the

> Now that I'm looking again at these pages, the pseudo-Windows logo
> doesn't strike me as self-explanatory (besides its specific touch of
> ugliness). Would you be ready to consider using a different one, such
> as
> or
> or
> ?

Hmm.  I've never used xp or vista, so I'm not so familiar with the
pastel colors.  I have no real objection to changing, though.

... wait a moment, isn't Windows.svg the same as what we already
have? ... oh, ok, the current one has thick black borders.

I'll accept a patch for this.  You'll want to update the png file
and the copyright info in whichever macro file I put it in (can't

> > When he began working, he had one opinion and I had the other.
> > But over the past four months, we've switched positions like a
> > finely-honed comedy act -- we still disagree, but we've both taken
> > up the other person's initial position.
> Wait - so you're saying you *can* change your mind at times? :-)

If it makes things awkward and delays an aspect of website work
for 4 months, sure!

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]