[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Confusion about beaming
From: |
Marc Schonbrun |
Subject: |
Confusion about beaming |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Sep 2010 21:47:11 -0700 |
Hello,
I was wondering about why the decision was made in the input syntax parser to
view beaming groups as follows:
}
\relative {
c8 d [e f g a b c]
}
The above snippet beams from the d through to the final c. At first glance, it
would appear that the brackets are encasing the e through c, and those notes
would end up beamed together, but, alas, this is not the case.
This is one of those things that I can happily learn, but it takes a pause to
get it right. Can someone comment on the history of this? I am simply curious.
Thanks,
Marc
- Confusion about beaming,
Marc Schonbrun <=