On 07/09/10 23:55, David Rogers wrote:
* Matthias Kilian <address@hidden> [2010-09-07 22:22]:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:10:59PM -0700, David Rogers wrote:
I really only see two requests for change, which pop up again and
again;
those are of course the two recently discussed - making the list the
default reply-to address, and prefixing the subject line.
Graham already said that this will not change. Go figure out why.
:-) Nice.
It's easy to see that only the published standards are pedantically
correct in all cases. That wasn't my point. I argue that "not
pedantically correct in all cases, but easier to use ninety-five percent
of the time and easy to fix the other five" is a better solution. I
don't run this list, and I know who does, so I was already aware of
where I would be asked to put my opinion. Doesn't mean I don't have one.
:)
If your changes make it "easier to use 95% of the time", then why are -
I would guess about 50% - of the responses to this thread saying "it
works as it is, don't change it" ?
I think the evidence is against you ...
Cheers,
Wol
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user