Re: Optimising output for screen

[Tim Reeves]

> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:31:09 +0100
> From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
> To: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>    reply-type=original
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Phil Burfitt" <address@hidden>; "Trevor Daniels" 
> <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 4:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen.
> 
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> 
wrote:
> >> So I would conclude - if you need excellent screen display, you'll 
either
> >> need a carefully written PDF viewer, or a screen with a resolution of 

> >> around
> >> 1000 dpi.
> >
> > If anybody is seriously interested in this issue, then why not look at
> > the mailing list archives for one the discussions between developers
> > (including Han-Wen, one of the founders of lilypond) about this
> > PRECISE ISSUE ?  This whole discussion, and any time you guys have
> > spent making images, is simply re-hashing the previous two discussions
> > on this topic... except without the opinions of the person who knows
> > lilypond the best.
> >
> > - Graham
> >
> > PS if you want a hint, one of those discussions was in 2007.
> >
> 
> Thanks.  Now read it.  Also:
> 
> http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/address@hidden/msg01792.html
> 
> I was making the images for my own interest and thought it was 
illustrative 
> of the way Reader works.
> 
> --
> Phil Holmes
> 



There was even earlier discussion in 2006, starting here: 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-06/msg00198.html 

Tim Reeves