[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Triple b or # - do they exist? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:25:01 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Joseph Wakeling <address@hidden> writes:
> On 10/22/2010 04:51 PM, Éditions IN NOMINE wrote:
>> Well, well, well, who would like to typeset some Reger ? :-D
>
> Looks like a recent (hardcoded in the C++) transposition rule rewriting
> any accidental greater in magnitude than a double-sharp or flat may have
> to be revisited ...
Why? It is sort of pointless to reach notes by transposition that could
not be entered directly, anyway.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?, David Nalesnik, 2010/10/22
- Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?, Valentin Villenave, 2010/10/23
- Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?, David Kastrup, 2010/10/23
- Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?, Valentin Villenave, 2010/10/23
- Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?, James Lowe, 2010/10/23
- Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?, David Kastrup, 2010/10/24
- Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?, Martin Tarenskeen, 2010/10/24
Re: Triple b or # - do they exist?, Nick Payne, 2010/10/23