Re: Increasing grace note separation

[Sven Axelsson]

On 3 January 2011 06:18, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> I have recently had a discussion on the list about unstretchable
>>> grace note groups. The solution was to set GraceSpacing
>>> spacing-increment to zero. That is fine in all instances except for
>>> the one in the example.
>>
>> \relative c'' {
>>     a {\squeeze \grace {\small \stemspace #'(0 . 0.5) c32[ a8 g32]}} a4
>> }
>
> This is a nice ad-hoc solution, but the whole issue rather smells like
> a spacing bug, triggered by some untypical conditions...  Can you
> isolate the problem, providing a minimal example?

Well, I get the same problem without squeezing the grace note group.
It is really only happening for beamlets to the right, so here's a
minified example.

\relative c'' {
    a { \grace {\small b32[ g8]}} a4
}

Also try the original example witout any fixups, and notice the
disproportionate spacing, caused of course by the different note
lengths. But it looks pretty bad.

-- 
Sven Axelsson
++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++>++++++
>++++<<<<<-]>++++.+.++++.>+++++.>+.<<-.>>+.>++++.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>----.<++.>>>++++++.<<<<.>>++++.<----.

tight spacing with beamlets to the right.png
Description: PNG image