[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default beaming for 3/4
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: Default beaming for 3/4 |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:23:17 +0200 |
On 26 Aug 2011, at 15:14, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2011, at 13:07, Nick Payne wrote:
>
>> According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond
>> default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following example; it should be
>> beamed as in the second bar:
>>
>> \version "2.14.2"
>>
>> \relative c' {
>> \time 3/4
>> c4. c8 c c
>> c4. c8 c[ c]
>> }
>
> The first measure is called "in three", that is, beams are broken, so as to
> indicate beats. The second is called "in one"; engraved as though there are
> no beats.
Oops, typo! - It is the reverse. When the beams are broken, it is in three;
when not, in one.
Hans
Re: Default beaming for 3/4, Hans Aberg, 2011/08/26
- Re: Default beaming for 3/4,
Hans Aberg <=
Re: Default beaming for 3/4, Gerard McConnell, 2011/08/26