[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Feb 2012 01:16:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 |
On 2/3/12 1:43 PM, "Tim McNamara" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:07 PM, James wrote:
>
>> Attached is the output
>
>Those look good! "Nice job" to the OP!
>
>But for that last chord with all the "add" stuff- is that the default
>output? Yuck. The repetitive use of the word "add" should not happen,
>although I have no clue how to fix it and offer a solution so I should
>stop bitching...
>
The latest development version eliminates all the "add" stuff.
Thanks,
Carl
- polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, James, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Tim McNamara, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Tim McNamara, 2012/02/03
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/05
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/05
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/16
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/17
- Re: polychords: a working solution, James, 2012/02/17