[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:50:18 +0100 |
Hi David,
2012/3/5 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Graham Percival <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:07:09AM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
>> > I just downloaded the LSR.tarball from today and ran a last successful
>> > test.
>> > I'd like to send it to Sebastiano.
>>
>> Please do.
>>
>> > Shall we postpone the change of the description for
>> > increasing-spacing-between-staves.ly?
>>
>> No; if there's only one snippet left to alter, just stick that on
>> your "todo" pile and fix it in the web interface after the entire
>> thing is running 2.14.
>
>
> I just finished rewriting the description a moment ago. I'll fix it once
> the update is through.
Sorry, I've just sent a tarball to Sebastiano. I hope that all is correct.
THANKS A LOT FOR ALL YOUR HELP!!
Best,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/03
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/03
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, James, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/29
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/31