[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (Small) error in Notation Reference
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: (Small) error in Notation Reference |
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2012 11:45:59 +0100 |
Philip, you wrote Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:01 AM
>I think you should remove this comment too:
% if they are still too close, add more " " pairs
%
until the result looks good
It doesn't make any sense - I guess it is left over from an earlier
version.
Blast! I had noticed the above, also, when I was experimenting with the
code, but it floated out of my head.
There's no point in having a pedant's eye if you forget things. Anyway,
I'm glad you picked it up, and the efficiency
of you guys' system encourages me to send more stuff to you as I notice
it, although it will be simple, small, stuff
for at least the foreseeable future, I suspect. I am really feeling the
effort in climbing the LilyPond learning slope.
Stick with it, it all falls into place eventually! But it is hard
initially, that's
why it's important to correct misleading or confusing documentation. Any
help you can provide is most welcome. Your suggestion has already
been incorporated and will appear in the next release. Thanks!
Trevor
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: (Small) error in Notation Reference,
Trevor Daniels <=