[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: musescore lands sponsoring?
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: musescore lands sponsoring? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2012 18:56:56 +0200 |
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]:
>
> a) MusicXML export means the results are usable in a variety of notation
> programs making use of an open standard.
Indeed, having MusicXML exprort can give Lily more popularity.
> b) volunteers can be given a complete toolchain. "You can use an editor
> of your choice" is about as helpful for the average musician as "You
> can use a lathe of your choice".
LOL :D
how true! Valentin, that could be the next quote of the month :)
> d) "I am well-versed in LilyPond. What form do you want the entry in?
> Can I use music functions? What note language should I be using?
> Should the voicing be reflected in ad-hoc voices? Should I be using
> anonymous parallel voices? What kind of context mods should I be
> using?" "Uh, we better form a committee for that kind of question."
Good point.
That's why our KickStarter project (at least the first one) should be
a not-very-long piece for chamber orchestra. Or string quartet.
Something with 3-6 staves and 5-15 pages.
cheers,
Janek
PS there actually is one serious advantage of text input in a project
like this: we could set up a git repository for it.
Re: musescore lands sponsoring?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/05/29
Re: musescore lands sponsoring?, Carl Sorensen, 2012/05/30
Re: musescore lands sponsoring?, Jonathan Wilkes, 2012/05/30