|
From: | Joseph Rushton Wakeling |
Subject: | Re: Appreciation / Financial support |
Date: | Sun, 03 Jun 2012 19:07:22 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 03/06/12 17:44, David Kastrup wrote:
I don't want to remove "as much C++ as possible". That's about as useful as to remove "as much C as possible" from Emacs. The point is to consider C++ as the building language for primitives, and tie together the primitives in Scheme.
OK, I misinterpreted your remarks somewhat. I had read them as meaning that (besides re-architecting things so that control flow etc. was organized from within Scheme) you wanted to strip out the object-oriented side of things and move that over to Scheme, so that what was currently C++ would be pared back to being fairly pure C.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |