[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:14:55 +0100 |
On 13 févr. 2013, at 10:08, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> If the line breaking isn't expected to change, i think that the most
>> reliable solution would be to explicitely set staff distance in this
>> particular system.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but I think that such a severe collision
> should be fixed independently of the final layout. I'm still waiting
> for Mike's answer w.r.t. shifting up the skyline by inserting some
> padding.
>
>
> Werner
skyline-horizontal-padding won't work here. Try something like:
<<
\new Staff = "R" \relative c' {
\voiceTwo
d16[ b
\change Staff = "L" \stemUp
g
\change Staff = "R" \stemDown
b d b]
}
\new Staff = "L" \relative c' {
\clef "bass"
\voiceOne
\override Beam #'Y-extent = #'(0 . 100)
\override Beam #'vertical-skylines =
#ly:grob::simple-vertical-skylines-from-extents
g8[ s g]
}
>>
Cheers,
MS
- collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Janek Warchoł, 2013/02/12
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam,
address@hidden <=
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13