|
From: | Javier Ruiz-Alma |
Subject: | 19th-cent. accidental notation |
Date: | Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:10:02 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
I found an accidental notation rule in 1803 music introductory textbook by M. Clementi, says accidental was also omitted on the following bar it when happened to be first note played of same pitch as prior bar accidental (explicit example shown involves non-tied notes).
Seemed intuitive in the context of several of the pieces (see attached sample), so I've been applying [\once \override Voice.Accidental #'stencil = ##f] as needed in the typeset. Just wondered if there were some classical notation gurus that could educate me on how common this practice was (i.e. non-tied accidentals carrying over to first note of following bar).
Thx, Javier
sample-notation.png
Description: PNG image
accidental-rule.png
Description: PNG image
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |