|Subject:||Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?|
|Date:||Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:56:10 +0100|
Hilary Snaden <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2013-02-21 23:10, David Kastrup wrote:
>> However, LilyPond indeed has a weakness in as far as it does notWell, it is not going away since the primary generator of LilyPond files
>> really have a "file format". It is an evolving input language.
> If that's a "weakness", it's one I'm happy to see maintained
are humans rather than programs.
As opposed to a "file format",
however, the only reliable reader (not just interpreter) of LilyPond
files is LilyPond itself. That's a disadvantage for interfacing with
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|