[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pseudo-handwritten font
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Pseudo-handwritten font |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:20:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup writes:
>> Wow, very impressive!
>
> I hate to admit it, but it looks like a game changer of strategic
> importance to me. People tend to pick LilyPond to get the best
> typesetting.
Yes. Wow.
> What needs to be done for this?
I put quite some effort in supporting Gonville as an external
font, as at the time it took 5+ hours to build it and we did
not want to ship a font binary-only.
If/after we get this in, possibly we should look into Gonville too
and we would have three different looks. Game changer indeed!
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
- Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, (continued)
- Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Johan Vromans, 2013/03/17
- Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Robert Schmaus, 2013/03/15
- Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Denis Bitouzé, 2013/03/19
- Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Tim McNamara, 2013/03/19
- Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Xavier Scheuer, 2013/03/20
- Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/03/07
- Re: Pseudo-handwritten font,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/06
Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Nathan, 2013/03/06
Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Klaus Föhl, 2013/03/07
Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Tim McNamara, 2013/03/15
Re: Pseudo-handwritten font, Tim McNamara, 2013/03/15