[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:35:35 +0200 |
2013/4/23 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 2013/4/23 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>> But what word are we spreading? "Can it work with our existing
>>> scores and data, possibly through MusicXML?" "No, but if it could,
>>> it would likely be the best at it."
>>
>> yeah, that's bad. But it's not like Lily has only "potential"
>> capabilities: scores can be done using it, with good results.
>
> Sure. But interoperability is not something we can truthfully advertise
> as a capability when nobody is working on it or even planning to work on
> it. Not even when we have full agreement that it would be nice.
yes.
>> Bottom line: i'd also like the situation to be better before starting
>> serious "adverstising". But if we wait too long, we won't arrive at
>> anything.
>
> We won't arrive at anything by advertising, either. Particularly not by
> focusing our advertising on the things we are bad at and painting them
> in a wrong light. That's just a recipe for a disappointed user base.
Agreed - we should advertise things we're good at.
>> In other words: if we practice too long, we'll miss the performance.
>
> I am more worried about us practicing other instruments and pieces than
> on the concert announcements.
agreed. let's just change concert announcements and get back to work ;)
best,
Janek
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, (continued)
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Urs Liska, 2013/04/22
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/22
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Urs Liska, 2013/04/22
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/22
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Urs Liska, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Janek Warchoł, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Janek Warchoł, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Urs Liska, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Carl Peterson, 2013/04/22
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Christ van Willegen, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, David Kastrup, 2013/04/23
- Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2013/04/24
re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Peter Wannemacher, 2013/04/21
Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper, Klaus Föhl, 2013/04/22