[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \include problem in Scheme function
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: \include problem in Scheme function |
Date: |
Thu, 09 May 2013 12:54:20 +0200 |
Am Donnerstag, den 09.05.2013, 11:38 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to implement a way to compile a score from a given music
> > expression. THe idea is to have a huge score edited in small chunks and
> > being able to only compile the tiny chunk one works on currently.
> >
> > First I tried several things to compile a book within the function but
> > didn't succeed.
>
> Minimal example?
>
Minimal example (for that part) is already the solution (sometimes you
have to post a question in order to be able to answer it yourself :-)
compileSegment =
#(define-void-function (parser location segment)
(ly:music?)
; construct book
(let ((book #{ \book { \score { \new Staff $segment } } #}))
(ly:book-process book #{ \paper {} #} #{ \layout {} #}
(ly:parser-output-name parser))
); close let
) % end function
music = { c d e d c \origBreak } % origBreak is defined in an include-file
\compileSegment \music
################################################
What I didn't achieve so far is how to \include library files.
It seems I can write an \include statement within \book before \score,
and it seems to find the file.
But it seems there are two problems with that:
a)
'music' is parsed before the \include is done within the function, so
\origBreak is still 'unknown'
b)
I get all sorts of messages about syntax errors in the included file, so
I have the impression such an \include from within a Scheme function is
something quite different from a regular \include in LilyPond mode.
################################################
Now what's still missing is the check whether the compiled file is a .ly
or a .ily file.
(ly:parser-output-name parser) gives me everything that's _not_
interesting in this case. Is it possible to get the file extension of
the file currently compiled?
Any further enlightenment highly appreciated!
Urs
- \include problem in Scheme function, Urs Liska, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, David Kastrup, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, David Kastrup, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, Urs Liska, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, David Nalesnik, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, Urs Liska, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, David Nalesnik, 2013/05/09
- Re: \include problem in Scheme function, Urs Liska, 2013/05/09
Re: \include problem in Scheme function, Phil Holmes, 2013/05/09