[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mea máxima culpa
From: |
Tim McNamara |
Subject: |
Re: mea máxima culpa |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:49:59 -0500 |
On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:14 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Patrick or Cynthia Karl <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> From: Thomas Morley <address@hidden>
>>> To: Patrick or Cynthia Karl <address@hidden>
>>
>>> [deleting billions of lines]
>>
>>> From: James Harkins < address@hidden>
>>> Patrick or Cynthia Karl <pckarl <at> mac.com> writes:
>>
>>> Well, I don't have an answer to the question, but... a reminder... it is
>>> VERY
>>> uncool to quote an *entire digest* when you're replying to only one message.
>>
>> I am so sorry and will try to do much better.
>
> Maybe the reply-to header of the digest should not even point to the
> list? Replying to a digest makes no sense with regard to message
> threading
It would be logically consistent since the reply-to header is not set to the
list for non-digest subscribers, but what would be the alternative?
address@hidden
- mea máxima culpa, Patrick or Cynthia Karl, 2013/09/11
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Tim Roberts, 2013/09/11
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Tim Roberts, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, David Kastrup, 2013/09/12
- Re: mea máxima culpa, James Harkins, 2013/09/12