Re: Problem with LilyJAZZ.ily

[Curt]

Is it considered "bad behavior" to open up a github repository with Thorsten's 
contribution, and then apply the patches to it, for that to be considered the 
source of truth?


On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:33 AM, Marc Hohl <address@hidden> wrote:

> Am 08.10.2013 06:23, schrieb Keith OHara:
>> Thomas Morley <thomasmorley65 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> 2013/10/8 Steve Noland <steve <at> thenolands.us>:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> 
>>>> On a Mac, when trying to compile the jazz-test-3.ly file, I get the
>>>> following error from Lilypond re: the LilyJAZZ.ily file:
>> 
>>> Try replacing #(define (jazz-keysig grob) ...) with Keith's suggestion:
>>> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Pseudo-handwritten-font-tt142117.html#a147230
>>> 
>> 
>> Steve, could you put a link to that fix near wherever you found LilyJAZZ.ily 
>> ?
>> 
>> The history is, I extended the key-signature print function last August, for
>> development version 2.17.1 and eventually stable 2.18.  Meanwhile Thorsten 
>> was
>> probably working on LilyJAZZ, and had to depend on some undocumented 
>> internals
>> of the old key-signature print function.  In March he posted the version that
>> works with stable LilyPond 2.16.
>> 
>> Probably Thorsten, or any of us, will update his .ily file for version 2.18 
>> when
>> that comes out.
> 
> AFAIK Torsten has not answered any mail request since the beginning of
> August. I hope that this is does not imply any serious incidents ...
> 
> But some more or less "official", easy to be found location with the
> possibility to download (and update) code would be fine.
> 
> Would it be an option to include the file and the fonts similarly to the
> articulate script?
> 
> Marc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user