[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:46:13 +0100 |
2013/10/30 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Also, you may be interested in this:
>>> https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/input-shorthands/late-evaluation-of-variables.ly
>>
>> I can hardly count the number of ways in which this would have blown up
>> in 2.14. I don't consider most uses of eval a good idea anyway, but
>> making bad ideas work as expected is still an impressive feat.
>
> Actually, since there is Scheme syntax creeping in anyway, it might make
> more sense to use Scheme macros here and have less quoting blurb, and in
> particular not the ugly eval:
Thanks! I've updated the snippet.
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, David Kastrup, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, David Kastrup, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, David Kastrup, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Urs Liska, 2013/10/08
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Hans Aberg, 2013/10/08
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Janek Warchoł, 2013/10/07