[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102 |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:57:36 +0000 |
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 20:28 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So interesting that this came up on the list this week… I was brainstorming
> an orchestration teaching tool,
In case it is not widely appreciated ...
All sorts of tools and teaching aids become quite trivial if the music
is stored in a computer-friendly data structure rather than a
human-friendly one. This is one extra reason for doing the bulk note
entry using Denemo, besides the sheer speed and ease of sight-reading
music while entering it. Writing loops over movements, staffs, measures
and notes is trivial using Scheme, so that any sort of query can be made
without much effort.
Richard
> where one could find the distribution of notes in an instrument across an
> entire score, to show students where [good] composers tend to have their
> instruments play.
>
> How hard would that be to implement as a function?
>
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- RE: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102, Jan Rosseel, 2013/12/11
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/12/11
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102,
Richard Shann <=
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102, David Kastrup, 2013/12/12
- RE: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102, Eduardo Silva, 2013/12/12
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102, Jim Long, 2013/12/12