[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jul 2014 12:49:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
Helge Kruse <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup:
>
>> <fis a d fis>4<f! a d f!> <f a d f> q
>> Well, just write the latter version.
> Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord".
Reminder or forced accidentals, it would appear.
> My example has a fourth chord. Without it the latter version doesn't
> have any q.
>
>> It appears I have
>> mentioned this when entering issue 3593 as having _also_ been discussed,
>> illustrating how important the bug squad is for not letting reports get
>> dropped silently.
>>
> So is this considered as a bug? Since #3593 is closed it should be
> recorded as a new bug?
With q, it is more of an enhancement request. With
Completion_heads_engraver, it is more of a bug than a limitation because
you cannot really work around it.
Both are separate requests concerning separate code.
--
David Kastrup
- Skipping reminder accidentals in, Helge Kruse, 2014/07/13
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in, David Kastrup, 2014/07/13
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q, Helge Kruse, 2014/07/13
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q, James, 2014/07/13
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q, David Kastrup, 2014/07/13
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/07/13
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q, David Kastrup, 2014/07/13
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/07/13
- Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q, James, 2014/07/13