[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentals centred above notes
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: Accidentals centred above notes |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:28:08 +0100 |
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 14:16 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Richard Shann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > the docs (
> > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/self_002dalignment_002dinterface
> > ) say:
> > "
> > self-alignment-X (number)
> >
> > Specify alignment of an object. The value -1 means left aligned, 0
> > centered, and 1 right-aligned in X direction. Other numerical values may
> > also be specified.
> > "
> >
> > which doesn't give much clue as to what the units are... (if I'm looking
> > at the right thing)
>
> The units are pretty well-defined. -1 means left-aligned, 1 means right
> aligned. So moving the entire width of the object from left edge to
> right edge implies a difference of 2.
>
> So the unit is half the object width.
Ah, thank you, I see. I think it would be well worth adding that last
sentence to that description. I've submitted this suggestion to
bug-lilypond
Richard
- Accidentals centred above notes, Richard Shann, 2014/08/07
- Re: Accidentals centred above notes, Phil Holmes, 2014/08/07
- Re: Accidentals centred above notes, Janek Warchoł, 2014/08/07
- Re: Accidentals centred above notes, Richard Shann, 2014/08/10
- Re: Accidentals centred above notes, Janek Warchoł, 2014/08/10
- Re: Accidentals centred above notes, Richard Shann, 2014/08/11