Re: Supporting ♯ and ♭

[Owain Sutton]

> A non-techie might have problems knowing the difference between # and ♯, and 
> between b and ♭
> And what about the double-sharp? What symbol would be used for that?
> 
> I agree it is easier to read. But you normally don't use LilyPond just to
> read music. But if you do, you are definitely not a non-techie :-)
> 
> IMO opinion using these unicode symbols for sharps and flats is an
> interesting idea - but I personally will probably never use it.
> 

I agree, it's likely to remain a niche option. I don't see that as a reason for 
not including it though, and as for double-sharps, is "c♯♯" more problematic 
than "cciscis"?