Am 20.11.2014 17:27, schrieb tisimst:
Urs,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Urs Liska [via Lilypond]
<
[hidden email]>
wrote:
Am 20.11.2014 15:24, schrieb
tisimst:
I'm afraid I don't entirely understand your question...
1)
Did you produce the condensed set?
Yes.
2)
If so, did you design the glyph shapes individually or through
applying some sort of automatic scaling?
Automatic scaling. I realize this may be heresy, but it works,
doesn't it?
I don't want to discuss if it's heresy, but it's noticeable.
I didn't test it on a score yet, only on a document with continuous
text (where it may not be so appropriate in the first place), and
the result *is* quite noticeable.
However, I'll have to test it as LilyPond lyrics, and maybe in a
document with narrow columns where you'd expect a condensed font.
Thanks anyway
Urs
I think that's clearer, isnt it?
Urs
Yes, thanks for clarifying :)
Regards,
Abraham
View this message in context: Re:
Text fonts
Sent from the User
mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user