Re: grace note bug?

[Jaime E Oliver]

Hi all, thanks for the responses. Indeed the slashed grace is the wrong example 
as the slashing is not supported for more than one note, which I agree is an 
oversight as it is common in contemporary music.

However if you look at it with /grace, I mean that:  

\grace {a32 a32}
should probably be the same as:
\grace {a32} \grace {a32}

The way I saw it was that two \grace expressions should render two grace notes 
in a row since I did not get a warning at all, just a weird score. 

I can adapt to this behavior of course.

Thanks again for your responses.

best,

J


On Jan 3, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Jaime E Oliver <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi everyone, 
> 
> I am not sure if this is a bug, or just improper use, but, when using a 
> single grace note expression with two notes such as:
> \slashedGrace {a'32 a32} 
> I get the expected result.
> 
> But when I use two subsequent ones such as:
> \slashedGrace {a'32} \slashedGrace {a32}
> I get the wrong score representation. 
> 
> I am assuming it is a bug as the software should be able to parse it. While 
> it seems unusual for a human to write that, it would not be uncommon in 
> computer generated material. 
> 
> Below is a testing code. 
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Jaime
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> \relative c'' {
> 
> \time 4/4
> 
> % example 1 correct
> a4 \slashedGrace {a'32 a32}
> d,4  d2
> 
> % example 2 bug?
> a4 \slashedGrace {a'32} \slashedGrace {a32}
> d,4  d2
> 
> }
> 
> \version "2.18.2"
> % notes Pd External version: testing_0.01
>