[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Information about Parts
From: |
Alicuota618 |
Subject: |
Re: Information about Parts |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jan 2015 08:58:09 -0500 |
Dear Matt,
I dont compose. I arrange, mainly church music (choir, brass-choir,
organ, piano) and theory (combining texts and music). Seldom using
parts...
The beginning was quite arduous, I had no idea of programmin and
wanted to arrange directly in ly. Got it but then came Frescobaldi and
changed the game.
Have a eye at it. Its really the usefull app for composing.
Greetings,
Francois
2015-01-09 4:48 GMT-05:00, Richard Shann <address@hidden>:
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 16:35 -0800, Matthew James Briggs wrote:
>>
>> I'm starting to wonder if I should just skip it and learn Lilypond
>> instead, thus my object-oriented world could output Lilypond code
>> instead of MusicXML.
>
> I think that would be very wise: IMHO MusicXML gives the impression of
> something well-designed and comprehensively thought-out whereas the
> reality is that it is a horrendous hotchpotch of constructs singularly
> unsuited to describing written notation. With its horrible going
> forwards and backwards in time semantics, I doubt if it is suited to
> describing music events either.
>
> Richard Shann
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
- Information about Parts, Matthew James Briggs, 2015/01/08
- Re: Information about Parts, Urs Liska, 2015/01/08
- Re: Information about Parts, address@hidden, 2015/01/08
- Re: Information about Parts, Noeck, 2015/01/08
- Re: Information about Parts, Shane Brandes, 2015/01/08
- Re: Information about Parts, Colin Campbell, 2015/01/08