Re: ugly default output

[Urs Liska]

Am 01.03.2015 um 00:07 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
> >  In my experience, lilypond tends to produce better output for longer
> >  pieces -- presumably because there's more room for adjustments to
> >  optimize the layout.  Therefore I wouldn't judge just by the first few
> >  bars alone.
>
> I am well aware of that. I have no doubt it will look much better when
> the piece is complete. I just wanted to give a particular case of what
> can go wrong when typesetting such a smaller exerpt.

Yes, but I'd repeat that this is less LilyPond's fault than a problem of 
having an amount of music that is inherently unsuitable to be typeset 
nicely on one system.


--
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org